Holes in the Wall

climateadaptation:

“Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall says it’s time to push back against what he called myths being perpetrated about Canadian oil and a controversial pipeline that would ship oil from Alberta to Texas.

The premier said Canada’s image and the country’s trade relationship with the United States are not…

So it’s cleaner from a carbon standpoint. What about other standpoints, other types of pollution? The world is not so easy that carbon is the only thing for people to worry about.

Not only have we messed with and dirtied the environment on earth, we’ve even dirtied orbit. Human impacts have left the surface of the earth and is spreading out into the solar system. Thankfully, at least admitting that there’s a problem with this is a step forward to fixing it.

climateadaptation:

Bittman nails the Obama administration today in this surprising (to me) piece on the current trend of profits over environment. He connects a lot of dots, but brings it together in the end. (I’d counter by saying that Obama was in a fix - he has had to choose jobs and stimulus over the environment).

I think this section is worth quoting in full: 

Sacrificing the environment for profits didn’t stop with Bush, and it doesn’t stop with genetically modified organisms. Take, for example, the Keystone XL pipeline extension. XL is right: the 36-inch-wide pipeline, which will stretch from the Alberta tar sands across the Great Plains to the Gulf Coast, will cost $7 billion and run for 1,711 miles — more than twice as long as the Alaska pipeline. It will cross nearly 2,000 rivers, the huge wetlands ecosystem called the Nebraska Sandhills and the Ogallala aquifer, the country’s biggest underground freshwater supply.

If Keystone is built, we’ll see rising greenhouse gas emissions right away (tar sands production creates three times as many greenhouse gases as does conventional oil), and our increased dependence on fossil fuels will further the likelihood of climate-change disaster. Then there is the disastrous potential of leaks of the non-Wiki-variety. (It’s happened before.)

Proponents say the pipeline will ease gas prices and oil “insecurity.” But domestic drilling has raised, not lowered, oil prices, and as for the insecurity — what we need is to develop wiser ways to use the oil we have.

They say, too, that the pipeline could create 100,000 new jobs. But even the Amalgamated Transit Union and the Transport Workers Union oppose the pipeline, saying, “We need jobs, but not ones based on increasing our reliance on Tar Sands oil.”

Sounds as if union officials have been reading the writer and activist Bill McKibben, who calls the pipeline “a fuse to the biggest carbon bomb on the continent,” and NASA scientist Jim Hansen, who says the oil Keystone will deliver “is essentially game over” for the planet.

Game over? No problem, says the State Department (read the rest below:

Source: NYTimes

In support to the many people, including the various indigenous people I know are out there defending their lands, protesting in Washington DC. More and more, it seems that people forget that lives, health, and ecosystems are almost never recoverable. And with this project? You may as well mark all living things in its way dead as soon as the permit is reached, but that’s why there are people fighting to stop it.

A panel commissioned by President Obama has revealed that within the two year period of 1946-1948, over 1300 Guatemalan citizens were exposed to STDs against their will. They report at least 83 deaths, including that of a woman who had already been battling a terminal illness and had been infected with gonorrhea in her eye. As trials, they yielded no useful medical knowledge.

The National Housing Authority: “We do not want to initiate telling them about this because that would at once spark resistance.”

When they are trying to keep information away from the people being affected, you know something shady is going on.